Thank goodness for that signature on the back of my credit card. If it weren't for that smudged scrawl, a thief might steal my card (or card number) and make fraudulent purchases. Or steal my identity. Right.
Each month, it seems, we learn of another large-scale data breach at a major retailer or financial house -- Target, JPMorgan, Home Depot. On a smaller scale, most of us have probably received a call from our credit card company or bank reporting "suspicious activity." But have you stopped to think about just how outdated the technology of the credit card is? In an era of bits and bytes, PayPal and bitcoin, why are we still using raised plastic numbers and scribbles of ink?
Laziness? Inertia? Who knows? But it doesn't make sense, and if we don't act to correct this glaring technological deficiency, we have only ourselves to blame.
Last week, a House Commerce subcommittee, chaired by Rep. Michael C. Burgess (R-Texas), started the ball rolling on possible data security legislation, and this week a Senate subcommittee will follow suit. It's a vast and complex issue reaching far beyond credit cards, to areas such as health records, government offices and the entire cyber universe. A General Accountability Office report, for example, found that in 2013 U.S. federal agencies suffered 25,556 incidents involving possible loss of personal information, up from 10,481 incidents in 2009. The hacks of Sony and Apple iPhoto late last year, meanwhile, have finally drawn attention to the destructiveness and ugliness of cyber vandalism.
Payment card hacks, while less sensational, are relatively well understood and could be mostly (and quickly) solved with a simple technological tweak.
Last year, credit card hackers and thieves defrauded consumers and their financial institutions out of an estimated $11 billion. More than half of the losses were in the U.S., in large part because of America's use of the 1960s plastic-and-ink technology. Much of the world has since leapfrogged to a more advanced, yet simple, "chip-and-PIN" approach. The chip is a tiny microchip that is more secure than both raised plastic numbers and easily foiled magnetic strips. The PIN is a personal identification number, familiar to debit card users, and far more difficult to hack than an ink signature.
In a study of attacks on information networks and major theft of information assets in 2013, a group of 50 global firms and public entities observed 63,437 security incidents and 1,367 confirmed data breaches. The report's conclusion: 2013 was "a year of transition from geopolitical attacks to large-scale attacks on payment card systems."
And yet the U.S. lags. After the United Kingdom adopted the chip-and-PIN approach, credit card fraud plunged by 75%. Most debit cards today have the PIN, although few of them have the chip. Few U.S. credit cards have PINs.